systemd staging branch: rename systemd copies of packages

These packages have the same name in the extras/systemd dir of the master_staging_systemd branch, as in another directory:

• gnome-shell-mobile
• mutter-mobile
• (are there more?)

This is not supported by pmbootstrap, and since pmbootstrap#2328 (closed) is already quite some effort, I'd rather not add this to it. So I propose we rename the packages to gnome-shell-mobile-systemd and mutter-mobile-systemd. This also makes it immediately clear which version of the package is installed to the user, by the package names.

@calebccff: thoughts? / would you like to do this?

changed milestone to %initial systemd support

I'd prefer this as well, mostly because it's just more obvious what you have installed. The KDE packages currently don't use that suffix because I followed what was done for Phosh/GNOME, but I rather just add it.

By Bart Ribbers on 2024-04-18T06:43:21

I don't think this makes sense. We decided to split systemd into it's own binary repo specifically to avoid the situation where you install the wrong variant of a package like gnome-shell-mobile. If we take this approach then what happens when I do apk add gnome-shell-mobile?

Sure we can add all the provides trickery to make this work, but this only makes our binary repo(s) more fragile and introduces the risk that a user ends up with the non-systemd variant. I would rather put the complexity in pmbootstrap and avoid those bug reports.

By Caleb Connolly on 2024-05-24T10:14:14

added systemd label

assigned to @calebccff

By clayton craft on 2024-05-01T17:07:48

Closing as we discussed and decided not to go with this approach.

By Caleb Connolly on 2024-05-24T10:14:40

closed