nokia-n900: pmbootstrap install fails for libcrypto.so.42 (uboot-tools binary package broken in upstream repo)

Created by: sicelo

Thanks for opening the issue! I have been struggling with it for some time, and had come to the conclusion that it affected only me, as everyone else on IRC seemed to not have issues.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:39 PM, Duncan Guthrie notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm attempting to run the installation program for the Nokia N900.

I first started by selecting the xfce4 interface. However, the problem is there for no interface at all:

(002617) [15:31:03] (rootfs_nokia-n900) calculate depends of postmarketos-base, ttf-droid, device-nokia-n900 (pmbootstrap -v for details) (002617) [15:31:04] NOTE: Run 'pmbootstrap pkgrel_bump --auto' to mark packages with outdated dependencies for rebuild. This will most likely fix this issue (soname bump?). (002617) [15:31:04] ERROR: Could not find package 'so:libcrypto.so.42' in any aports folder or APKINDEX.

I'm doubtful this is an issue due to the recent libressl library bump: I've tried running pmbootstrap update && pmbootstrap index; and I've tried running pmbootstrap pkrel_bump --auto, too, to no avail. I can build fine for qemu-vexpress.

Unfortunately, pmbootstrap isn't particularly clear about what is causing the error. If this is a packaging issue, I'd expect it to show what depends on libcrypto.so.42, for instance.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/postmarketOS/pmbootstrap/issues/1408, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADAxL6O1g1mAqjyw7jXXWBGTHmBpRxj_ks5tnhW4gaJpZM4TQKUZ .

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T14:49:57

Created by: ollieparanoid

I guess one of your locally built packages was built against so:libcrypto.so.42 (which is one of the old libressl's sonames), and it has the same version (pkgver and pkgrel) as the upstream packages. This means, that pmbootstrap will your package instead of the one in the postmarketOS binary repository.

This should be fixed with:

pmbootstrap zap -p
rebase your branch on the official master branch

If it still does not work, can you try to reproduce this with the master branch? And what do you get when specifying pmbootstrap -v for verbose mode? Then it should tell us where the libcrypto.so.42 dependency comes from.

Sorry for the trouble, and thanks for opening this bug report!

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T18:38:11

Created by: sicelo

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 06:38:12PM +0000, Oliver Smith wrote:

I guess one of your locally built packages was built against so:libcrypto.so.42 (which is one of the old libressl's sonames), and it has the same version (pkgver and pkgrel) as the upstream packages. This means, that pmbootstrap will your package instead of the one in the postmarketOS binary repository.

This should be fixed with:

pmbootstrap zap -p

rebase your branch on the official master branch

This happens on a completely different machine, with the master branch, so there is more to this.

And what do you get when specifying pmbootstrap -v for verbose mode? Then it should tell us where the libcrypto.so.42 dependency comes from.

(020680) [20:48:00] so:libexpat.so.1: provided by: expat (020680) [20:48:00] expat: already found (020680) [20:48:00] NOTE: APKINDEX not found, assuming no binary packages exist for that architecture: /home/sicelo/pmos/pmbootstrap/packages/armhf/APKINDEX.tar.gz (020680) [20:48:00] so:libfreetype.so.6: provided by: freetype-2.9-r0 in /home/sicelo/pmos/pmbootstrap/cache_apk_armhf/APKINDEX.066df28d.tar.gz (020680) [20:48:00] so:libfreetype.so.6: provided by: freetype (020680) [20:48:00] freetype: depends on: so:libbz2.so.1,so:libc.musl-armhf.so.1,so:libpng16.so.16,so:libz.so.1 (020680) [20:48:00] NOTE: APKINDEX not found, assuming no binary packages exist for that architecture: /home/sicelo/pmos/pmbootstrap/packages/armhf/APKINDEX.tar.gz (020680) [20:48:00] so:libc.musl-armhf.so.1: provided by: musl-1.1.19-r7 in /home/sicelo/pmos/pmbootstrap/cache_apk_armhf/APKINDEX.066df28d.tar.gz (020680) [20:48:00] so:libc.musl-armhf.so.1: provided by: musl (020680) [20:48:00] musl: already found (020680) [20:48:00] NOTE: APKINDEX not found, assuming no binary packages exist for that architecture: /home/sicelo/pmos/pmbootstrap/packages/armhf/APKINDEX.tar.gz (020680) [20:48:00] NOTE: Run 'pmbootstrap pkgrel_bump --auto' to mark packages with outdated dependencies for rebuild. This will most likely fix this issue (soname bump?). (020680) [20:48:00] ERROR: Could not find package 'so:libcrypto.so.42' in any aports folder or APKINDEX. (020680) [20:48:00] Run 'pmbootstrap log' for details. (020680) [20:48:00] See also: <https://postmarketos.org/troubleshooting> (020680) [20:48:00] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/sicelo/pmbootstrap/pmb/__init__.py", line 61, in main getattr(frontend, args.action)(args) File "/home/sicelo/pmbootstrap/pmb/helpers/frontend.py", line 179, in install pmb.install.install(args) File "/home/sicelo/pmbootstrap/pmb/install/_install.py", line 411, in install pmb.chroot.apk.install(args, install_packages, suffix) File "/home/sicelo/pmbootstrap/pmb/chroot/apk.py", line 195, in install packages_with_depends = pmb.parse.depends.recurse(args, packages, suffix) File "/home/sicelo/pmbootstrap/pmb/parse/depends.py", line 159, in recurse "' in any aports folder or APKINDEX.") RuntimeError: Could not find package 'so:libcrypto.so.42' in any aports folder or APKINDEX. You can let us know if more info is needed.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T19:00:44

Created by: ollieparanoid

@sicelo: thanks! Yes, in fact I would need some more information. There should be a line above saying something like: ????: depends on: so:libcrypto.so.42 Would it be possible to clear the log, and then attach the full log (you can attach it directly in the GitHub issue as file)? Log can be cleared with pmbootstrap log -c.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T19:11:35

Created by: sicelo

Awesome, that gets us somewhere. Thanks @ollieparanoid Culprit is uboot-tools and that explains why so far it is only N900 with the problem.

log.txt

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T19:28:48

Created by: ollieparanoid

Okay, uboot-tools is marked as outdated for armhf, but up to date for almost all other arches.

Unfortunately the build-edge-armhf didn't rebuild everything against the new libressl yet: http://build.alpinelinux.org/

As a workaround, you can build uboot-tools against the current libressl yourself:

$ cd pmbootstrap
$ mkdir -p aports/_temp/uboot-tools
$ cd aports/_temp/uboot-tools
$ wget https://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/plain/testing/uboot-tools/APKBUILD
$ pmbootstrap build --arch=armhf uboot-tools

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T19:44:40

Created by: sicelo

Thank you for quick help! I tested this and it works fine.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-11T20:48:23

Created by: duncanguthrie

This appears to have fixed the issue.

Thank you for taking the time to debug this.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-12T00:20:45

Created by: ollieparanoid

You're welcome! Hopefully the new wiki page Troubleshooting:dependencies will make it easier in the future.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-12T21:12:19

Created by: ollieparanoid

Reopening until this is fixed in upstream and the uboot-tools package is removed from our aports again.

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-17T21:23:51

Created by: ollieparanoid

Looks like I did not click the "reopen" button. Anyway, the binary package is up to date again in Alpine, so I'm removing it from our aports again. Now it's resolved

By * postmarketOS Bot on 2018-04-21T19:02:33

nokia-n900: pmbootstrap install fails for libcrypto.so.42 (uboot-tools binary package broken in upstream repo)

Child items 0

Activity